I was working a part time,
temporary job in which I asked people to apply for a credit card. It was a job fraught with rejection. I would stand outside a convenience store/gas
station and approach EVERYONE to solicit him or her to apply for a credit
card. There were lots of reasons why
folks rejected my offer of a credit card.
“I’m in a hurry.” “ I have bad credit.” “ I don’t buy gas here often.” My personal favorite, “I never use a credit
card.” To be honest, with an interest
rate of 29.99% I wouldn’t want one of these cards myself. Part of the job was rejection; lots of
rejection.
After turning down my offer, one
patron asked me, “How is it going today?
Getting many takers?” I
answered, “This is a great job if you need to learn how to handle rejection.” For every 20 people I approached with this
stellar offer, 19 would say no. Most
were polite, some engaging and conversational and more than a few were rude. I also spent a lot of time with nothing to do
but watch the shadow creep across the concrete.
But it gave me time to think, especially about the value of rejection.
Ours is a society with a growing
sense of self-importance. It is the age
of pride, convinced of how important we are, in which the prime value is self-esteem. Rejection is, therefore, especially hard to
accept. The greater our pride the
greater our offense when we are rejected.
In a culture driven by
consumerism and advertising, we are taught to do everything possible to avoid
rejection; everything from buying mouthwash to having the ‘right’ clothes or
cars or address. To be rejected, to be
the outsider, to not be included may be the worst fate we can possibly
experience. Parent to teenager, “If all
your friends jumped off a cliff would you?”
Honest teenager, “YES.” And in a
sense we are a society of teenagers.
Wherever this pattern spreads the
implications are bad. We could talk for
days about what it means in politics, respect for police officers, or sexual
morays. But when this creeps into the
church, it can have eternally negative implications. It
appears that the church has become so afraid of rejection that we are beginning
to act like an early adolescent obsessing in from of a mirror wondering what
others think of us. Unless you have been living in a parallel universe, you
cannot help but notice that we are living in a media craze about deviant
sexuality. From the first NBA player to
come out, to the first openly gay football player to be drafted into the NFL,
to the radical mutilation of a formerly Olympic athlete there is an explosion
of sexually driven drama. In the midst
of this whirlwind of noise and pseudo news, the message I hear from the
conservative church, not exclusively, but dramatically, is one of fear of
rejection by culture at large and concern about image.
For those of you who have not
unsubscribed from the blog on that last paragraph (I can embrace that
rejection) let’s step away from that powder keg and look at a couple of areas where
we might live in the tyranny of fear of rejection. Using these examples we might find a template
for a better approach.
Worship:
No one is in favor of boring,
monotonous worship. But shaping our worship
based on opinion polls to avoid being rejected or to shape our worship to suit
people tends to shift the focus and object of worship. How many times have the worship wars begun
when someone says, “I want” this or
that kind of music. It can be
traditional or contemporary; the same narcissistic spirit drives them
both. And we feed that spirit by trying
to avoid rejection from either a segment in the church or the world. We try to please as many as possible with our
compromises and politically arrived at decisions.
I understand that the forms of
worship must have a cultural aspect.
What is dynamic, effective worship in an outlaw church in China will not
be the same for a gathering of believers under an Acacia tree in Kenya. I am not proposing that there is one form by
which we all must worship. But one
story may illustrate the struggle. I
visited one church and when I was handed a bulletin I was offered earplugs. I must have had a quizzical look on my face
because the greeter volunteered, “We like our music loud.” The ownership
statements in their reply told me more than they might have expected.
It is time for us to embrace the
rejection that comes when we refuse to make the worship, and especially the
music, simply another choice to please me.
Is it time for us to tell demanding individuals, “You didn’t like
something in worship? GOOD! Worship is not about you or for you.”?
Teaching:
I am not in favor of picking
fights. The methodology of the Westboro
Baptist Church is clearly deeply flawed, if not demonically guided. We will not develop the right to be heard by
the lost world by yelling at them that they are lost. But in our world today the anthem of
compromise is sung loud and by a large choir.
We are advised that the prime virtue is tolerance and/or
acceptance. I do not know any preacher
or Bible teacher that publicly advocates compromise or says, “I’ll gladly
change my core convictions in order to be popular.” I do know preachers that categorically
refuse to address certain Biblical themes for those same reasons. If pressed on the issues, these preachers
would say they believed the teachings of scriptures, but because of past
rejection these Biblical subjects have become a taboo they will not address. A conviction that is held in the heart, but
is not taught and lived is not much of a conviction.
It is time we embrace the
rejection that comes when we lovingly address the difficult statements of
scripture.
As I wrote this, I kept coming up
with other areas where the cultural fear of rejection has impacted the
church. Given its head this list would
be endless. I would end up railing
against all of my pet peeves and frustrations.
So, I will reframe from opening up the cans of worms associated with
discipleship, evangelism, church discipline, etc. and ask you to look at your
own life and ministry and reflect on where you need to embrace rejection.
The better approach:
This better way is found as a
lonely individual walks away from the seat of power on a lonely and deeply
rejected path. In the ancient Roman
world, when a man carried his cross he usually did so alone. There would, of course, be spectators, by
standers, the accompanying guards, accusers, curiosity seekers, and even
sympathizers. In the case of Jesus,
there was even a commandeered, temporary slave.
But, ultimately, the cross is for one alone, one rejected. When we are told to take up our cross, we are
told to embrace rejection.
No comments:
Post a Comment