Monday, March 21, 2016

Cinderella, Walt Disney and the American Church


If you have never read an older version of the Cinderella story you might not know that it has very little resemblance to the Walt Disney retelling of the story.  In the version provided for us by the Brothers Grimm there is no fairy godmother, no helpful mice, or pumpkin carriage.  In this older version Cinderella’s stepsisters are very beautiful, her father is a jerk toward her and her help comes from her dead mother and two birds that tend to hover about Cinderella’s mother’s grave, and the story is violent and bloody.  

This old story was a cautionary fable for children to teach them to be “devout and good”.  The Disney version was an entertainment effort designed to make money for the Disney Corporation.  Disney could not have been true to the original version and get the film to theaters.  Some scenes would not have been palatable for Pollyanna consumers of children’s entertainment.  For example, when the prince arrives with the golden slipper the eldest stepsister tries the shoe on in private, but her foot will not fit.

But her great toe prevented her getting it on.  Her foot was too long.
Then her mother handed her a knife and said, “Cut off the toe. When you are Queen you won’t have to walk any more.”
The girl cut off her toe, forced her foot into the slipper, stifled her pain, and went out to the prince. 

 It was only on the way to the palace, tipped off by the birds, that the prince notices the bloody trail following them and hence he returned the older sister.  The second sister was able to get her toes into the shoe, but her heel was too big and so at the insistence of her mother she cut off her heel.  The results were the same.  On the way to the palace the prince, tipped off by the birds, again noticed the bloody trail.  One wonders how bright this prince was.  He returns the second daughter and then Cinderella tries on the shoe and it fits.  But the story is not done.  The stepsisters come to the church for the wedding hoping to curry favor with Cinderella and as they are going into the church the two birds attack them and each girl has an eye pecked out.  After the ceremony, as they were coming out of the church, the birds attack again and each girl has her remaining eye plucked out. 

The story doesn’t end with the happy married couple riding off in a carriage to live happily ever after.  The ending is not really about Cinderella at all.  It concludes with; “And so for their wickedness and falseness they were punished with blindness for the rest of their days.” This ending seems more Alfred Hitchcock than Walt Disney. 

In order to get parents in 1950 to spend money, and take their children to the theater Disney had to soften the hard, sharp edges of the story.  The optimistic and positive outlook of the 50’s would not be consistent with the self-mutilation and avian savagery of the older version.  To be successful, Disney had to give the people what they wanted, a story that was as hopeful as the American Dream. 

I fear that the church in America in the last generation has done much the same thing as Disney.   We have taken the edge off the message because, we think, people will not respond well to a message that is negative.  People want to hear ‘good news’ at church, but we have miss-defined good news.  We have defined good news down to personal peace and affluence.  I know a preacher that was once told by his leadership team to preach, “sermons that make people feel good”. 

I recently listened to the song “Hold Me” by Jamie Grace.  If the word "Lord" is an interjection, this is simply a love song of a girl for her boyfriend.  If the word "Lord" is a reference to the King of the universe, this song is the religious pabulum that makes up 'contemporary Christian' culture.  We have had to drop some key themes from the message of the Gospel in order to make is sellable to the masses.

I believe the Gospel is good news; it is, in fact, the greatest news.  But the message of the Gospel has no good news until we first explain the bad news.  Until we understand the bad news we have no way to value the good news.  Without hearing the bad news the message we have is little more than, “You are a nice person, but you may have a few little issues and your life is pretty good, but Jesus makes you, and everything else, better.”  If that is truly the message of the Bible, then it is a small wonder that the church in American is in rapid decline. 

But if the bad news is: “You are doomed, dead, lost and hopeless.  Your life on earth is a mere temporary reprieve from a just and fair punishment of utter isolation in a torment that is beyond imagination and is eternal.  At your very best you are vile, dirty, disgusting and as wholesome as a used tampon (Isaiah 64:6).  But the whole account of your evil and wickedness debt has been transferred to Jesus.  On the Cross He has made possible for His perfection and holiness to be transferred to you. It is yours completely free.”  When we hear the good new in light of the bad news, we see it really is the best news.

We do not need a Disney version of Christianity; there is just too much at stake for us to offer anything less than the good news of the Cross. 

No comments:

Post a Comment