“If you are giving something
great away for free and no body wants it, you are doing something wrong.” Amanda Arrington founder Pets for Life
After
the conviction of Michael Vick on dog fighting charges an Atlanta, animal,
welfare organization wanted to engage urban pet owners to help prevent other
cases of animal cruelty. They were going
to provide free veterinary services, pet foods, medication, collars, leashes,
and other services to urban pet owners in a community fair context. Despite their advertising, publicity, and a
great need the total attendance at the “End Dog Fighting” fair was two. They were giving away something really great,
but nobody wanted it. What went wrong? The entire perception of what they were, who
they were going to serve, and their agenda was askew. An event to end dog fighting is not going to
appeal to people that own dogs that are small, docile, very old, or very
young. It will not appeal to cat owners
or dog owners who hate dog fighting or to dog fighting dog owners.
A
couple of years later a similar event with the same aim was held in
Philadelphia. This time it was marketed
toward people who love their pets, any kind of pet, and who would be willing to
accept free help in caring for their pet.
The offerings were essentially the same, but the communication was
different. When the volunteers arrived
at the venue at 7:00 A.M. to set up for the 9:00 A.M. opening there was already
a line forming. Eventually, all the
supplies were distributed and still people came. Just under 1000 pet owners showed up and gave
their names and contact information.
What made the difference? It was
not the content. It was the
presentation, the communication.
We have the greatest
gift/grace in the universe and it is free for all. If people don’t want it, we are doing
something wrong.
I
recently had my heart broken. I listened
as a young lady told the story of her visiting a church. She had grown up in church, her husband had
not. After months of talking about
finding a church they finally took the plunge, found a church near their home
and took the step of visiting. They
arrived early and the following was the description I heard from this young
lady: (edited for brevity)
ü Parking was in the back, so
we had to find our way to the sanctuary.
ü After we sat down someone
told us the church had segregated seating (based on age and marital status) and
we should move to a seat near him.
ü We were asked if we were
married (twice).
ü We were asked when we were going to have children
(three times).
[Editorial
interjection: If I were a person who used profanity I would let loose
here. If this couple had recently
miscarried or were infertile such a question, beyond simply being rude, would
be devastatingly hurtful].
ü Before services began we
were told to move again because the youth were out on a trip and everyone
needed to sit in the center section of the church.
ü We were repeatedly asked, in
detail, what we did for a living. [He
has a job that involves a security clearance and as such these questions
demanded he give false information or breech his clearance].
ü We were asked to give our
number so we could be contacted about joining a small group.
ü When we put nothing in the
offering basket and handed it to the next lady on the pew, she glared daggers
at me.
ü The church provided no
hymnals and the words to the songs were not projected on to the screen. The same was true for Bibles during the
sermon.
The
couple gave the church high marks for its teaching and for its attempts to be
friendly. But they commented that it was
all terribly awkward. I checked out the
church’s website and everything looked great online. This young couple is planning to visit
another church next Sunday. I understand
that this is the impression of one couple and that they may not understand the
congregation, but it was a rough start. It
is my prayer that they will find a church home before they give up the search
in frustration.
What
happened? I believe it was the same kind
of thing that happens when an awkward young teen tries too hard to attract the
attention of someone of the opposite sex.
They were so wanting to be liked, accepted, and approved of by their
guests that they forgot about caring, genuinely caring, about the person. In the church, we have placed so much
emphasis on “attractional” ministry that we feel pressure every time a guest
shows up. We treat every service with a
textbook approach of how to care for a guest.
But the information that we gained at a conference we attended or a book
we read may not fit our ministry. These conferences
and books are great-they can teach us a lot of useful techniques. But if we rely on techniques, we are like the
young teenage girl trying to get attention by using too much make-up or the
teenage boy drenched in cologne. We will
make an impression, but it may not be the one we want.
What is the alternative? Not to dishonor what we learned from
conferences and books, but we must actually like people for who they are. People cannot become projects, targets, or
numbers. We cannot offer a façade of
caring that is designed to manipulate guests into being one of us. There is only one moment and that is now,
there is only one person and that is the individual. Genuine love, care and friendliness is much more
difficult than a textbook approach to guest services, but the only way to treat
people. The community that can
communicate interest in the individual for who they are can avoid the awkward adolescences
of ministry.
Very good advice. We often become blind to our own practices that can send mixed/wrong signals. Knowledge/awareness is power. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteWill thank you for reading and writing. If I can ever be of service please do not hesitate to contact me.
DeleteCharlie