When
it comes to door-to-door visitation or cold calling we are hearing two voices. One
voice says: “Going door to door is ineffective and a waste of time.” These voices often sight the change in
culture and the growing resistance to the church as reasons that going door-to-door
is not very effective. I once served as
a transitional minister and went to every home in the three neighborhoods
nearest the church building with no positive effect. For churches that have
such a strong commitment to reach their community but don’t want to do door-to-door
calling there must be an effective, strategic plan to connect with those
outside of the church’s sphere of influence.
Sometimes that takes the form of mass mailings, social or mass media
advertising.
But
there are other voices that say, “Going door-to-door will not reach everyone,
but it will reach some people.” This
link will take you to an interesting article from about 10 years ago about the
statistics associated with door-to-door calling programs. https://www.christianitytoday.com/edstetzer/2008/november/going-door-to-door-look-at-numbers.html
Before any door-to-door campaign can be successful there needs to be strong
support by the congregation for such a program.
For
both those who think door-to-door calling is ineffective and use another means and
those who think it can be useful and faithfully visit there is one narrative
presented. The general message for most churches is, “Here we are and we think
you will like us. So, why not give us a
try.”
But
what if we tweak that just a little? No,
let’s turn it on its head. What if
instead of saying, “This is us, you ought to try us, we think you will like us,”
we begin by saying, “Tell us about your community, your world and your life.” I have never met someone who was not at least
a little willing to tell you about what they care about. In fact, most good relationships begin with,
“Tell me about yourself,” and not, “I’m pretty special let me tell you about
me.” Which is exactly what we generally
do when we reach out to our community.
This
relationship-building thing is a much slower process than either a mass media
campaign or even door knocking. It is
possible to fake caring in a mass media campaign and even in a door-to-door
canvasing. But wanting to learn about the people in your community cannot be
faked. It will demand that we actually
get to know them and care about them.
We
can do this by asking, “What are the pressing needs in your neighborhood,
community, and world?”
We
certainly will not change the message of the gospel. We may not change the functional ministries
of the church, but if we did, it might not be all bad. But we, if we take to heart what we learn,
will have a better understanding of where our community needs the gospel
applied. It will inform both our short-term
mindset and our long-term strategy. But
best of all, we will become known to the people in our community as the folks
who care. Asking for help in
understanding has not been something that the church has done very gracefully.
One
of the long-standing weaknesses of the church is that we have been very good at
answering question that no one is asking.
Giving things that people may not need or even want and all the while
never getting to know them. I am
reminded of a church that collected and filled 150 (or so) backpacks for
children at a local elementary school.
Ironically, most of the kids had no need for what the church wanted to
give them. The backpacks the kids’
parents bought them were of better quality and filled with better school
supplies. When we have a great plan, but
never ask good questions we may get poor results.
How
is this different from the seeker driven model of the church growth
movement? In short, the difference lies
in the conversation the seeker driven church has about “felt needs” and the
individual’s interests. This other
strategy hopes to ask the question, in somewhat discreet terms, where is sin
ruining this community?
This
will also require meaningful follow up.
This can’t be one and done calling.
This needs to be a planned system of relationship building. The first contact is really about beginning a
friendship that will naturally lead to additional conversations.
There
is one thing about this that is challenging.
It requires a lot of work. It is
clearly impossible for this to be planned and executed by a single staff member
or even a team of staff members. A
project like this will absolutely require a church body that is committed to
being the incarnation of Christ in our communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment