Operation
Market Garden, the attempt to end World War 2 quickly via an airborne invasion
of Holland, has been described as a “bad plan, poorly executed”. Had Operation Market Garden worked it would
have ended the war by Christmas of 1944, saving 1000’s of lives. Only one thing was needed for Market Garden
to succeed, everything had to go perfectly.
If any one thing were to go wrong the whole operation would fail. Something, actually several things, went
wrong and Market Garden was a disaster.
A
church having a large debt is like operation Market Garden. If everything goes perfect it will be
okay. The following story is meant as a
cautionary tale and case study of the expensive lessons of church debt. Names are changed but all the details are
accurate.
A Dream come True
When
the new preacher arrived at Butler Community Church it seemed like all his
dreams had come true. BCC was 6 years
old and had an average attendance in the low 60’s to upper 50’s. The church was
in a booming suburb, owned 11 acres with a farm house converted to worship
space and held about $100K in debt.
Within a one-mile radius of the church, 2,500 homes would be constructed
in the next 5 years.
With
a full time preacher the church began to grow.
Soon 100 worshippers packed the little farmhouse every Sunday and on
special Sundays they had to meet outside because the farmhouse was too small. The Lord was blessing and the preacher was
sure the time to build had come. The offerings were more than covering the
expenses.
What
was unknown to the preacher was that the church had begun with a very unhealthy
start. What had been described as a
church plant was in reality a very ugly church split and no one had ever
addressed some root issues. This unhealthy congregational DNA would manifest
itself during the campaign to payoff the building debt.
Time to Build?
It
was decided that the church should build a multipurpose building with a main
meeting room (seating 375) that could also be used for fellowship, sports, and
recreation, adjacent to the multipurpose space there would be 5 large
classrooms. Once in the new building the
farmhouse would be updated with class, conference, and office space. With an approach of “Functional but not
opulent” construction cost would be about $400K and would give the church a
total of 11,000 square feet of useful space.
Total debt would be just under $500K furnished; the cost would be about
$45 per sq. foot. The building would be
highly useful, but easy to build and maintain.
Once
in the building the growth of the church took off again. Attendance jumped from about 100 to over 140
in about 3 months. The church was seeing
decisions for Christ and new families weekly.
It felt like this was going to be one of those church- growth, super
stories. At the same time, construction
began on a subdivision of 800 homes next door to the church building.
New wine began to burst the
old wine skins.
The
operational system of a church of 150 is very different from the operational
system of a church of 60. Stress began
to develop between the founders of the church and the new members about the
vision for ministry.
Where
once a few good ‘ole boys and girls made decisions, the leadership had shifted
to a board. The result was a power
struggle. There developed an effort to
get rid of the preacher who had advocated much of the change and who had brought
in all these new people. In protest to
the new reality the old guard began with- holding their offerings until they
were satisfied.
If
this continued, the church would not be able to make the mortgage
payments. In a show down vote, the
attempted coupe failed. But a few weeks
later, while the preacher was out of town, the board was pressured to make
three concessions to the old guard. The
preacher would be asked to, “Preach sermons that made people feel good. Not to change anything. Not to try to get new people, but to take
care of the ones we’ve got.”
Unable
to accept these terms, the preacher left the church. He was heart broken. Not only because he was leaving a ministry he
loved and hoped to stay with for the rest of his life, but also because he was
well aware of what was in store for this church.
In
the months that followed his departure, attendance declined rapidly and a
number of ministers came and left. Soon the attendance was back close to 60,
there were no new families coming in, and a new minister was called to a part
time status. It was only a matter of
time before the death of the church.
Those who remained were faced with the terrible consequences of their decision. The property was put on the market for the
debt and the end had come.
Debt was not the Problem
The
ultimate problem with BCC was not debt, but debt became the one thing that kept
the church from surviving its problems. Unfortunately, unscrupulous people will
sometimes use their financial position to attempt to control the direction of
the church. When a church is heavily in debt and not operating with a strong
margin it is very vulnerable. In this
case had there not been a large loan, the old guard would have had little
leverage by withholding their giving.
They no doubt believed they were doing what was best for the
congregation, but they also would rather see the church close than lose their
power and control.
The Danger of Church Debt
The
danger of debt is two fold. First, it
prevents us from taking advantages of opportunities that may present
themselves. A church that is operating
with little or no margins in its budget may have to turn down fantastic
ministry opportunities because it has made financial promises to repay a
debt. There is no way to calculate the
high cost of lost opportunity.
Second,
it allows for no margin of error. While
debt is not morally wrong, it is dangerous.
Debt is not a problem if everything goes just right, but, rarely, does
everything go just right. A down turn in
the economy, a number of families moving, or an insignificant church conflict
can be enough to compromise the whole congregation.
What is a church to do?
First,
if there is a level of debt that is adversely impacting ministry, dealing with
that debt needs to be a priority. While
adjustment can be made inside the church’s budget the ultimate and only lasting
solution is retiring the debt. Part of
the process is discussing how debt is interrupting the church’s vision and
hurting its ministry future. A
stewardship campaign to retire debt can be very effective if it focuses on the
ministry of the church in the long term, and not just the current budget cycle.
Second,
if a church is planning to expand its ministry by adding building space,
renovation, or augmenting staff do so from a strong financial position. While it takes longer to begin construction
when the church develops capital first it allows the church to have a stronger
margin and makes it more able to survive difficulties WHEN they arise.
Call Us for World Class
Coaching.
If
you have plans for a new building or ministry expansion call us and let’s talk
about enabling your vision for ministry and securing that vision from a confident
position.
Charlie Crowe
V.P. Coleman Stewardship
Services
352-548-4837
No comments:
Post a Comment