Getting ready to look at the Seven Churches of Revelation
If Jesus Google rated churches,
What if Jesus rated churches today? Forgive me if I am being anachronistic with the church, but I was wondering if Jesus wrote a Google review of the seven churches, how would they do on a scale of one to five? My guess is that a couple would do fairly well, but most of these churches wouldn’t. That caused me to wonder, how would our churches do? Which caused me to chase down another rabbit trail.
I looked up on Google “Churches in (city name withheld)” and looked at their reviews. I reviewed the first 20 churches to populate the list, and to my surprise, they all rated pretty high, the lowest score being a 4.4. The churches in this city rated on average 4.76, which struck me as a bit odd; I seemed to be missing something. This community has a crime problem, a drug and alcohol addiction problem, rumors of corruption in the local government, and widespread educational failures, not to mention a not very well-hidden problem with hatred in the guise of racism. How is it that in a community that is suffused with the symptoms of sin every church is extremely good? One would think that with every church being great, the powers of darkness would be receding if not vanquished. How can this be? I have a few ideas of what may be happening. I do not mean to ridicule or degrade the church, but I am bothered by what I see.
When Jesus looked at the churches listed in Revelation, only the churches at Smyrna and Philadelphia did not receive stinging rebukes, and those churches don’t look much like us. In fact, these two churches that were given positive divine reviews didn’t have the things that typically get a church good reviews on Google. In contrast, the churches that appear to have the things we would value most—wealth, tolerance, reputation, lots of activity—were the ones most soundly criticized.
Why is it that the Lord’s opinion of these seven churches is for the most part negative while our opinion of our churches is so positive? There are several possibilities for this. But not all of them are equally valid.
The first possibility is that Jesus is just too demanding. He may have been an un-pleaseable fussbudget that, no matter how good the church was, he was going to find some little thing to complain about. But when we look at His indictments of the church, we see those He rebuked had hideous problems. We also see that His agenda was not criticism but to rescue the churches. We must reject this explanation.
A second possibility is that the churches of today have grown and evolved into genuinely great churches. It may be that our churches really are as good as we seem to think they are. But if that is the case, why are most churches in America in decline or flatlined? Why is the current church so fractured and divided both within and without? Why is there regression in all the disciplines by which we can measure the life and walk of the individual Christian? No one who seriously considered the question would ever imagine that the condition of the American church is anything other than grave. This second possibility we must also reject.
There is a third possibility. The reason that we rate our churches so highly is because we like them for entirely selfish reasons. We have turned religion into a consumer commodity. As individuals, we have made a priority of our likes, dislikes, appetites, and requirements as the means by which we evaluate a church. We have made our wants the idol to which we expect a church to sacrifice itself. If we attend a church and we do not like something, indeed anything, about that church, we will leave and go find a church that suits us. Having done this a few times, we have migrated into churches we like, and thus we rate them highly. This is the only possible explanation of how every church can be so highly rated and yet the church is so utterly carnal, divided, ineffective, and self-satisfied.
We must not, however, place all the blame on the membership of the church. The church is a mess in America, and church leadership is a big part of the problem. In order to grow churches numerically, to keep members from drifting to other congregations, to keep offerings coming in, and to keep the people happy, church leaders have, with good-intentioned motives, pandered to the whims of the religious consumers in their churches and community. Telling them what they want to hear and programming to their demands.
It is a small wonder that the churches are so highly rated by their members and consumers. But that still begs the question, “What if Jesus rated churches today?”
“Lord, help me see the church the way You do. AMEN”