Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Looking for Jesus when He can't be found.

There is time as in the hour of the day and there is time as in the opportunity. In John 7, Jesus is at the Feast of Tabernacles. He is speaking in the temple courts. The Great Divide is growing between those who believe in Jesus and those who do not.  The opportunity for faith is theirs; they have in that moment the opportunity.  But Jesus tells them, “You will seek me and not find me and where I am you cannot come.”  While in their presence Jesus was speaking to these people of the time when he would return to the Father.  They would seek Him, but because they rejected the truth that he was from the Father, and he had returned to the Father, they would never find Him.  The opportunity would be lost. 

We are so familiar with the words of Jesus, “Seek and you will find.”  We hold these words like a no limit credit card that places Jesus at our bidding.  How do we reconcile this promise with this other saying of Jesus that we can come to the point that we will seek him but we will not find Him?  “Seek and you will find.”  “You will seek and not find.”  The time or opportunity is there and then the time or opportunity is lost.  We become flippant about sin in our life. We do not take seriously the grave warnings of scripture about righteousness. We treat both Holiness and un-holiness as matters of little consequence. We fail to seek the Lord when He can be found. As a consequence we spiral into greater depth and darkness, and into an absence from God.  It is only when we finally hit rock bottom we start seeking Jesus.  But we may not really be looking for Jesus, but only for a genie. So wrapped up is our self and our sinful life (shall we use the word Flesh) we don't want to have Him as Master and Lord. We only want Him to be a bail bondsman to get us out of the fix we are in and then we wonder why we can't find Jesus. Every dalliance with sin, every dabbling with evil is a potential one-way street to this hopeless destination.  Any individual act of sin is like an on-ramp to a highway to hell.  There are exits where we can turn around, but the longer we drive the less frequent the exits, the longer between exits.  We can even get to the point that there are no exit ramps at all.

So where is the place where we must be to seek the Lord in order to find Him? That place is the cross, His cross and our cross. It is the place where we will recognize the truly monstrous evil of our sin!  It is a place where we have a change of mind and will to turn from sin and self, and to die to these.  In a word it is the place of repentance. We can’t see Jesus without repentance.  We can search till the stars burn out and we will not find Him.  We must renounce ourselves i.e. the flesh, the world's system, and the devil and in Repentance we find Jesus.  May we never forget that before there is the blessing of finding Christ there is the repentance moved by the Cross. 

“Holy Spirit, convict me, bring your holy judgment on me, show me where I hold anything without repentance, show me where I must turn from evil. Grant to me, Lord, a true and heartfelt repentance.”


Tuesday, October 16, 2018

When Jesus ran away.

There is an occasion in scripture where Jesus ran away.  The One who went through the Garden of the Olive Press all the way to the most horrific death in the history of mankind had a moment when He ran away.  It wasn’t out of fear, but we see him on this one occasion running away.  There is a dynamic lesson for us in that moment.

The multitude had followed him because of the healings of the many sick people he had done. They followed Him out into the wilderness.  They had followed him long enough that He was concerned for their well being.  And so He feeds the crowds of people with as much as they want to eat.  In fact, the proliferation of food is so dynamic that after everyone had all they wanted there was food to spare.  In a poor, oppressed and overtaxed, occupied country this was very likely a rarity.  There may have been people there who had never been so full and still had leftovers. Some may not have known anything but scarcity their whole lives.  When the meal was over some of the crowd began to move and agitate to make Jesus their King.

Let’s face it; Jesus would make a great king. First, there is free, universal, health care that could cure every illness and every disease.   Typical medical care was often ineffective and was not cheap, so miraculous healing for free is a pretty good offer.  Also, having plenty of food provisions for the entire nation was not out of the realm of possibility. If five loaves and two fish could feed 5,000 families imagine what the entire economy placed at his disposal could do. It would be fantastic.   This move to declare Jesus king would of course mean a war with Rome.   But if he can heal the sick, why not combat wounds?  An army travels on its stomach, but with this kind of king provisions for a whole army could be easily carried in one bag.  From the perspective of a person looking for an earthly king no one could possibly do a better job than Jesus.

Being an earthly king was not on Jesus's agenda. The words in John “take him by force” carry certain violent overtones.  The multitude, which may have been turning into a mob, was not concerned with Jesus’s agenda.  He would be made king like it or not. As we read the parallel passages we get the idea that as the tumult builds Jesus dismissed the crowd, but they would not be dismissed, so Jesus sends his disciples away in their boat and He takes off for the hills. 

In describing Jesus's departure some early manuscripts (Sinaiticus among them) have the word “fled back” instead of the words “withdrew again to the mountain.”  We could discuss at length which word John used. In other words, Jesus ran away.  Jesus gathered his disciples and told them to get away and then in the chaos and pandemonium Jesus headed for the hills literally. Jesus moves out of the crowd perhaps secretly maybe in a fast walk or even in a trot, but He literally runs away.  Why? There would be no reasoning with this crowd and there would be no opportunity to teach them the difference between an Earthly and Heavenly Kingdom.  There would be no turning this misguided movement into the right direction. Best to leave it all behind and let It settle down.  Sometimes retreat is the best plan.


So, what does Jesus’s running for the hills have to do with us?  When we have a selfish agenda and we are trying to put a “God” sticker on it, when we hope to impose our will on the Lord and get him to bless what we are doing, the best we can hope for from Him is that He will walk away from us.  How often have we got our plans all laid out and then pray for God’s power and blessing and might to work out what we want?  Jesus will not be used for any agenda except the Father’s!  Jesus is not your personal ATM, valet, or genie!  It is high time that we stop trying to make our agenda something that it is not, by calling it God’s will.  “Thy Kingdom come Thy Will be done” does not have room for my program.  You want to see Jesus walk away from you in a hurry? Do your own thing and try to get Him to endorse it.

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Why are our churches ineffective at reaching the lost?

Could it be that we are not growing because we have such poor eschatology?  I am not suggesting that we should begin to schedule prophecy conferences.  I am not a big fan of prophecy conferences, some of which are little more than commercials to sell books that sensationalize current affairs and take scripture out of context.  Our poor eschatology is of a more profound nature than the simple folly of setting dates for the second coming.  It tends to be selfishly focused.  It is about how you can have some sort of advantage in the last days, inside knowledge, first in line in the Rapture, or stock pile food for the Tribulation all depending on your convictions or audience. 

In the movie Twelve Strong the Afghani General Dostrium (Dostum) is quoted as
You live in a place where life looks better than the after life.
saying to the American Army officer:
“Your anger comes from your fear.  Because you live in a place where life looks better than the after life.  That is not this place…. You will fail because you fear death.  Taliban welcome it.” 

In the west, and in the American church in particular, our lives are so good we can’t fathom any radical improvement to life.  We would all agree that our lives need some minor adjustments.  A small alteration here, a little modification there would make things a little better, but by and large life is pretty good.  We have luxury unmatched in human history, medical care that is accessible and effective, we have entertainments and distractions and wealth and pleasure.  We have begun to think of heaven as an improvement on all that we have.  We joke that Heaven is where ice cream will not make us fat.  It is a joke but it reflects a deeper and more fundamental understanding, or misunderstanding, of the afterlife.  We have begun to see Heaven as better rather than different.  Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit the authors of scripture were stretched to find symbols and metaphors for Heaven.  These symbols and metaphors were highly cultural and contextual so without that culture and context it is easy for us to lack understanding of Heaven.

We all want a little improvement in our lives, but we are incapable of imagining the fundamental changes that heaven will bring. So the church has made the mistake of preaching a gospel of improved life and self help rather that quantum change.  “How to” sermons have replaced the “Kingdom of God is at hand” as our theme.  Our appeal is having a better marriage, family, financial standing, community, physical condition and the list can be endless. 

Our failure in eschatology is the same failure we face in our worship, evangelism, community service, prayers, again the list could be endless.  So, how do we preach good eschatology (and everything else)?  By focusing on Christ.  In my role I have the privilege and sometime the distress of worshiping with a great many different churches.  The pattern I see too often is that church and all of our theologies have begun to orbit around us.  From the description of the incarnation as, “It is like God became a dude and hung out with us,” to, “What God wants is for you to receive what you want”, Jesus is presented as someone whose role is to solve our problems, answer our requests and make life here and now better for us.   We have mistaken God’s love for us with a narcissistic expectation that God will spoil us. 

As long as Jesus is presented as a means to an end we cannot expect God’s blessings on our ministry, His power at work in our lives or His Spirit calling fallen humanity to repentance.  In terms of therapy, Jesus may not be the best option.  In terms of feeling good about myself, Jesus is not the first choice.  In terms of better, economic performance, family relationships, sex, political power and social stability Jesus is likely never going to be the top ranked option.  As long as these among others are our teaching and preaching themes we can expect the church to grow more and more inconsequential.


When we turn the conversation to the greatness and glory of the second person of the Trinity and the Biblical and apostolic preaching of the cross we will see people drawn to Christ, not the temporary trinkets they think they want.  When we want Jesus so much we do not care if anyone else wants Him, then we will be compelled to tell the world what a great Savior He is.  Then if He wills our churches may grow. 

Tuesday, October 2, 2018

The sexual revolution has set us free.

More American lives have been shipwrecked because of the Sexual Revolution
than perhaps all other tragedies in our history.
The sexual revolution has set us free.  We are free like a ship with no rudder caught in a storm.

When a revolution begins it promises a better future, the end of some real or perceived injustice and a coming day where the revolution will benefit everyone in the society if not the world.  By and large revolutions don’t work, they frequently fail to deliver what was promised and with a frightening degree of regularity eat their own.  Life in Czarist Russia was bad, but nothing compared to the horrors of Stalinist Soviet rule.   Inspired by the success of the American Revolution (one of the few that succeeded) the French revolutionaries took their monarch to the guillotine and then they took each other.    Rebellions have a way of getting out of hand and going to places and having a cost that cannot be calculated.  The Taiping Rebellion in China cost the lives of 20 to 30 million people, with some estimates as high as 100 million.  The American Civil War, which would better be described as the Second American Revolution, is still sending painful shock waves through our nation.

The shock waves of another revolution are hammering our nation today.  The historic and traditional Christian view of sexual expression is one man married to one woman for one lifetime.  Sexual expression outside of that context is, in the context of orthodox Christian faith, wrong.  But the sexual revolution has challenged that view and the results are scattered around us like mangled bodies on a battlefield.  The first two phases of the sexual revolution failed to take root.  They are little more than skirmishes before the real war began.  The first was the rise of Burlesque in the late 1860s.  It was like other traveling shows of the time but with a distinctly sexual nature.  It has been glamorized as a fixture of cowboy movies.  But this phase never took hold.  The transient nature of the shows and the Christian worldview of the nation at the time kept them on the outskirts of town and society.  The second skirmish of the revolution was the roaring 20s.   The end of “The War to End All Wars”, the booming economy and the hopefulness of man ever onward ever upward fueled the ideal that maybe sex could be rethought.  Marx thought so, as did many communists: “You must be aware of the famous theory that in communist society the satisfaction of sexual desire, of love, will be as simple and unimportant as drinking a glass of water.”  That sentiment was not restricted to Russian socialists.  But the second skirmish also failed.  The rise of liberalism in American Christianity may have lowered resistance to traditional morality but the consequences of promiscuity were as real as ever.  Out of wedlock pregnancy was still a stigma and venereal diseases could still be fatal.  Besides, a world economic collapse and a world war would, for the moment at least, distract attention from a reshaping of sexual mores.

But in the 1960s came the massive offensive of the sexual revolution.  While that generation was not less moral than prior generations it had new weapons that made the revolution more effective.  The first of these was the pill, which effectively disconnected the idea of childbearing and sex.  Later, and in the event of pregnancy, an abortion could deal with unwanted pregnancy.  It is no fluke that one of the first voices for abortion on demand came from Playboy magazine.  The revolution was also aided by the pharmaceuticals that could, for the moment, effectively deal with V.D.  The consequences of sex outside of marriage were apparently mitigated so the revolution took off.   It appeared that the Revolution’s promise of a better future with sex that was free of any and all negatives was about to arrive.  For those who wanted a traditional life were welcome to enjoy that life.  But for those who wanted a more wild sexual life their day had come.  This revolution would benefit everyone in the society if not the world. 

Sixty years into the revolution how are we doing?  Now that anything goes has the promised world of universal sexual fulfillment arrived?  Do we now live lives of universal orgasmic bliss?  Hardly, in fact, if things could be worse it is hard to imagine how! If life before the revolution was the life of a restrained, suburban, middle class family in a 1950’s past, life in the revolution is a death camp where everyone waits their turn in an oven.  By every measure we are worse off relationally and emotionally after the revolution.

The number of abortions since Roe makes the Nazi final solution seem mild by comparison.  To date for every person murderd in the Nazi death camps there have been 10 abortions in the US since Roe v. Wade.  We need to remember that every woman who has had an abortion has suffered massively.[1]

One half of children will grow up without their biological father in their home.  That carries multitudes of destructive implications too numerous to list here. [2]

Before the revolution sexually transmitted diseases were fairly uncommon and there were two primary illnesses, Gonorrhea and Syphilis.  Today, it is estimated that 100,000,000 Americans have an STD.  Ironically, infection rates seem to be highest in the Bible Belt.[3]  Perhaps our churches should spend a little less time offering cheap grace and a cool Jesus and place greater emphasis on personal holiness.  The STDs of today are more dangerous than those of the past in terrorizing ways.

The list could be endless but there is no single category of emotional, relational or spiritual health that has been improved by the sexual revolution.  As a society we are depraved to the point that, if you want, you can go to public demonstrations of the most vile forms of sexual perversion.[4]  Such a society will not last for long.  Even if God does not directly intervene it will collapse from its own rot.
So who won?
Has the sexual revolution ended? Yes!  The revolution has ended and has spiraled down into sexual chaos, we simply no long know nor can we know what is right or wrong.  In this revolution there were no winners only losers.  The losers are the powerless and the weak, women and children specifically have suffered the most.  Ask any single woman who is a woman of holiness and wants to marry a Godly man, what she is finding. Ask the child whose dad left mom and kids for the pursuit of another woman or man.  Society as a whole is a loser; everyone it touched.  The only ones who come close to being a winner are the powerful, who can exploit others for their own gratification, and they loose more than they

know.  Let me state that Christian morality did not lose.  It is like a rock that the wave of the sexual revolution throws itself against.  Psalm 2 seems to be a most appropriate passage in addressing the revolution. 

While Christian morality doesn’t guarantee a life of sexual bliss and perpetual happiness, it does protect the innocent, the weak, and those without power.  It offers the real possibility of joy, happiness and fulfillment the revolution could never imagine.  It safeguards those without power so that they may have a chance at a life of love, joy and fulfillment. 

The more this seems an impossibility we need to remember that when we live a life of vice we do not believe a life of virtue is possible.  Doubt about a Biblical view of sexuality reflects not the failure of Biblical ethics but our own corruption.  



[1] http://www.numberofabortions.com/
[2] http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/12/22/less-than-half-of-u-s-kids-today-live-in-a-traditional-family/
[3] https://www.livescience.com/48100-sexually-transmitted-infections-50-states-map.html
[4] https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/S-F-kinky-naked-romp-a-spanking-success-3192869.php