Monday, March 30, 2020

The Crashing Twin-Engine Plane.

Once upon a time there was an airplane that was designed to make very, very long flights.  She was a marvelous aircraft and the crew had gone to great effort to make her the most comfortable aircraft they possibly could.  She was equipped with every kind of device for comfort, ease and entertainment.  When she was inflight she was a marvel of transportation. 

She was a twin-engine plane and each engine was a marvel to behold.  In fact, if one engine failed the other engine could keep her airborne and provide sufficient thrust to carry her to her destination and accomplish a safe landing.  Naturally, she was at her best if both engines were fully functional and operating at maximum output.  She might even take off with only one engine, but if she did it was always dangerous and the flight might not make it to its destination. 

On one occasion, this aircraft was making one of her long flights across mountainous terrain.  This was not the kind of place where she could perform an emergency landing.  As the flight progressed one of the engines began to lose power.  Slowly, engine #2 experienced diminished thrust and responsiveness.  The crew was not too worried because they were sure the plane was safe with a single engine.  Besides, engine #2 was not completely dead.  At some point engine #2 would be replaced by something else. 

Suddenly and with almost no warning, something completely unexpected happened and engine #1 was shut down.  There was little time to prepare for the total loss of power in engine #1.  It was clipping along fine and boom, almost nothing.  With both engines almost completely without power the only question was, “Will there be a successful restart of one or the other of these engines before the plane falls into a mountain, canyon, or river?”  There was only so much altitude and speed and momentum for the plane to use before the end.  With a glide ratio closer to that of a rock than an eagle, everyone on board wondered what would happen.

The church has/had two engines that give lift to her life and ministry.  The first was the large gathering or worship; the second was some sort of small groups’ ministry.  On the small group side of the church there was Sunday Schools, Bible studies, affinity groups, discipleship groups, to name a few.  While some churches have kept these groups active and growing, they have for a couple of generations been in decline as a whole.  To be sure, some churches have/had excellent small group ministries, but that is not universally true.  The emphasis has been on the other side of the plane.  The most focused-on measurable of church life has been large worship gatherings.  We may not want to hear it, but the truth remains, that size is what we count most and measure most.

Covid-19 has killed the worship-gathering engine of the church.  It remains to be seen how long the shut down will continue.  Sunday, from the Rose Garden at the White House, the President extended the shut down until April 30-well past Easter. Some have suggested that to be effective there needs to be a nationwide shut down for 5 months, perhaps longer.  When a church that has built itself around the “thrust” provided by the large weekly gathering and suddenly is not able to have that gathering, that church may be ditching on a mountainside.

What can we do?  I doubt that it is wise for churches to simply close and wait for the meeting ban to be lifted and hope that they will still have a congregation.  There may be several good solutions; here are few that come to mind.

Clearly, in the short term “virtual church” via the Internet is an option.   But we cannot hope to maintain real cohesiveness via virtual relationship. I have already had a conversation with a lady who told me that online was just not enough; that there was something profoundly missing.

One possibility is a hybrid between virtual church and small groups.  Many groups (all less than 10) gather, simultaneous to other small groups, to watch the online service and share together discussion, communion, or a meal.  This will greatly depend on the nature of regulations for social distancing and group gatherings.

Perhaps the answer is what we see from Samaritan’s Purse, which dispatched a team to New York this week.  Maybe the local church can organize itself around ministry to those who are in need.  This will keep the body connected, provide contact for disciple making, and allow them to be considered “vital” for the nation.

I would dearly love to hear what options come to your mind and heart as we consider how to be the Church in the age of Covid-19.

In the Cause
Charlie


No comments:

Post a Comment