Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Beware the short cuts: cannibalism, racism and prohibition, learning from past mistakes. Part #1


The Donnor Expedition is infamous in American history as an expedition that was caught in the high Sierra Nevada Mountains in the midst of a terribly harsh winter.   Many of the members of the expedition died in the frigid cold.  Some of those that survived did so by eating those that died.  In an act of compassion, the bundles of human flesh were labeled in such a way that no one would eat a family member.  Ironically, one of the survivors of the ill-fated expedition, after being rescued, opened a motel and restaurant.   The events of the Donner Expedition are infamous; what is perhaps less well known, is that this tragic suffering was the result of trying a short cut, the Hastings’ Cutoff. 

Short cuts can be dangerous and take us to places that we do not want to go.  Unfortunately, the allure of short cuts is often times so great that it seems impossible for us to say “no”, especially when faced with the hard work of going the long way.  I have spent countless gallons of gas, all wasted, because I was looking for a short cut.  It is not only true in issues of transportation, but also in issues of behavior and ethics.

The allure of a short cut is powerful.  They seem to promise a much anticipated and much desired reward and with less effort.  They seem to offer fulfillment much sooner than we would other wise experience.  The harder and the longer the ordeal we face, the more alluring a short cut seems.  Just the other side of the mountain is the Promised Land.  But crossing the mountain will leave us stranded, dying, and doing things we don’t want to imagine.

I believe this is true in our efforts to see a Christian ethic and morality in our society.  The current racial tension we have in the U.S. can serve as an example.  By contrast, the tension and relationship between the decedents of slaves and the general white population in Great Britain is less volatile than is the case in the U.S.  I would argue that this is the result of a short cut in U.S. history. 

Slavery in the British Empire ended as the result of the life long work of abolitionists, personified and led by William Wilberforce.  Wilberforce and the abolitionists ended the slave trade after a long battle fought for the hearts and the minds of the people.  The realization of the gross immorality of slavery was faithfully and consistently presented to a Christian nation, and ultimately the moral character of the people and the immoral character of slavery could no longer coexist.  After many years and struggles that took an emotional, physical, and mental toll on Wilberforce and the other abolitionists, the slave trade was ended in the Empire.  The battle was won in the battlefield of the heart; as the hearts changed the nation changed.  While Great Britain is not a racial paradise, it can teach significant lessons to those of us on this side of the Atlantic.

In contrast, slavery in the U.S. ended, not because of a moral revival, but because of a bloody war and a political move.  The “War to Preserve the Union”, more commonly known as the American Civil War was the end of slavery in the U.S.  But unlike the end of slavery in Great Britain it was a by-product of a political decision. 

Let me interject here a few words of rebuke for the American church.  I am not attempting to justify the position of southern states on slavery.  In fact, I believe that the greatest moral failure of American Christianity may be the failure of the American church, especially in the south, to speak out passionately concerning the evils of slavery.  The failure of the church in America to end slavery means that, not only does the church carry much of the guilt of the institution of slavery, but also the church has blood stained hands.  The war to preserve the Union might have been avoided were it not for the one issue about which there was no room for compromise-slavery.  The church, especially in the south, did not address the moral transgression of American Slavery and American’s killed each other in unimaginable numbers. 

Since the war, the church’s history in the south has been little more than abysmal.  Instead of the civil rights movement finding a passionate ally in the Evangelical church more often than not it found an obstruction.   If you want to know why 11:00 on a Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of the week, it is because when black Christians needed help, white Christians, especially in the south (with few exceptions), rejected their brothers in need.

Nor, am I trying to determine the political machinations of the Union.  Only President Lincoln knew the heart conviction of Abraham Lincoln concerning slavery and this is a question that is better answered by historians.  While I believe the emancipation proclamation was a carefully calculated political instrument, it was for many in the Union the deeper stirrings of conscience.  I will not try to divine the demarcation between political contrivance and impassioned moral conviction.

What I am saying is that the ending of slavery by force of arms was a short cut toward racial equality.  With the emancipation proclamation, the end of the War, and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, blacks and white were legally equal.  But it was an equality that came not from the heart nor did it come by godly men and women under moral persuasion.  It was an equality that came at the point of a bayonet and was recognized only in public, while rejected in secret.  The generation that lived through Reconstruction saw the rise of legalized prejudice in the form of Jim Crow laws, and the expansion of only slightly secret hate from the Ku Klux Klan.

As freed slaves moved to northern states seeking a better life they found that prejudice did not have geographic boundaries.  In fact, the Ku Klux Klan had its largest membership in Indiana in the 1920’s.  The KKK infiltrated every level of government with noted figures such as Sen. Robert Byrd, Chief Justice Edward White, Associate Justice Hugo Black, Sen. Theodore Bilbo, and Gov. Edward Jackson etc.  Both major political parties are well represented in the KKK.  The KKK even infiltrated the church.  It would even have cornerstone-setting ceremonies for new church construction, show up unexpectedly at a church for the worship service, and make denotations to the church.  On some occasions congregations would burst into applause for the KKK.  When a Klansmen was naturalized into his order he swore loyalty to his nation and Christianity.  The founder of the second Klan was a former minister.  Rather than the evils of slavery ending by the power of a moral church a short cut in some cases, by no means all or even most, turned the church over to the powers of evil.

To be continued……


No comments:

Post a Comment